Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 241
Filter
2.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 82(3): 1333-1344, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34151816

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Memantine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, is used for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. There is a caution to refrain from administrating memantine in combination with some specific drugs such as amantadine or dextromethorphan due to potential interactions that might augment the adverse effects of memantine. OBJECTIVE: This notification has not been validated in real-world data, which we aim to address using a large self-reporting database from Japan. METHODS: We conducted a disproportionality analysis using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database reported between April 2004 and March 2019 for detecting the neuropsychiatric adverse event (AE) signals associated with memantine and other potentially interactive drugs including amantadine, dextromethorphan, cimetidine, ranitidine, procainamide, quinidine, acetazolamide, citrate, and bicarbonate. Drug-drug interactions between memantine and these drugs were assessed using multiplicative and additive models. RESULTS: There was no statistically robust evidence to support multiplicative or additive interactions between memantine and the aforementioned drugs to increase the reporting of any included neuropsychiatric AEs or AE categories. CONCLUSION: The real-world JADER data did not raise the concern about the interactive increase in the neuropsychiatric AEs in patients with dementia taking memantine in combination with amantadine or dextromethorphan, suggesting there may be no urgent need to prohibit the co-administration of these drugs presently.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Databases, Factual/trends , Drug Interactions/physiology , Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists/adverse effects , Memantine/adverse effects , Pharmacovigilance , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Drug Therapy, Combination/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/psychology , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Retrospective Studies
3.
PLoS One ; 16(4): e0250457, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33886662

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) are used to collect adverse drug events (ADEs) for their evaluation and analysis. Periodical SRS data publication gives rise to a problem where sensitive, private data can be discovered through various attacks. The existing SRS data publishing methods are vulnerable to Medicine Discontinuation Attack(MD-attack) and Substantial symptoms-attack(SS-attack). To remedy this problem, an improved periodical SRS data publishing-PPMS(k, θ, ɑ)-bounding is proposed. This new method can recognize MD-attack by ensuring that each equivalence group contains at least k new medicine discontinuation records. The SS-attack can be thwarted using a heuristic algorithm. Theoretical analysis indicates that PPMS(k, θ, ɑ)-bounding can thwart the above-mentioned attacks. The experimental results also demonstrate that PPMS(k, θ, ɑ)-bounding can provide much better protection for privacy than the existing method and the new method dose not increase the information loss. PPMS(k, θ, ɑ)-bounding can improve the privacy, guaranteeing the information usability of the released tables.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Medical Records , Privacy , Serial Publications/trends , Algorithms , Humans , Interior Design and Furnishings/methods , Research Design
4.
J Addict Dis ; 39(1): 46-53, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32875958

ABSTRACT

Background: Nitrous oxide may be misused due to its euphoric, dissociative, and hallucinogenic effects. Nitrous oxide misuse has been reported to be increasing.Objective: The objective of this study is to describe nitrous oxide misuse reported to two United States (US) data systems.Methods: Cases were nitrous oxide misuse during 2000-2019 reported to the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), which collects data on consumer product-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs), and the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which collects reports of adverse events involving drugs and other biologic products. The distribution of cases was determined for selected variables.Results: Of the 26 NEISS cases, the mean annual number of cases was 0.5 (range 0-2) during 2000-2013 and 3.2 (range 1-5) during 2014-2019. The patients were 92.3% age 13-39 years and 76.9% male. The patient was treated or examined and released from the ED in 84.6% of the cases. Of the 128 FAERS cases, the mean annual number of cases was 0.4 (range 0-2) during 2000-2013 and 20.3 (range 10-34) during 2014-2019. The patients were 90.2%% age 13-39 years and 77.3% male. A serious classification was assigned to 97.7% of the cases.Conclusions: Nitrous oxide misuse reported to NEISS and FAERS both increased during 2000-2019, particularly after 2013. The majority of patients were age 13-39 years and male. Most NEISS patients were treated or examined and released from the ED.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Databases, Factual/trends , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nitrous Oxide , Adolescent , Adult , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Nitrous Oxide/administration & dosage , Nitrous Oxide/adverse effects , Sex Factors , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult
5.
Drug Saf ; 44(1): 95-105, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33354753

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based clinical data on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pharmacotherapies are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study documented and characterized COVID-19 cases reported in individuals receiving treatment with Pfizer pharmaceutical products and cases that reported use of Pfizer pharmaceutical products for COVID-19 treatment. METHODS: This retrospective observational review leveraged the Pfizer safety database containing adverse event data collected in association with use of Pfizer products between 1 October, 2019, and 25 June, 2020; the database includes worldwide adverse event data from various sources. Selected Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) Preferred Terms and subsequent clinical review were used to characterize COVID-19 cases. RESULTS: Over 1500 relevant cases were identified over an 8-month period. In cases that reported COVID-19, immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents, followed by anticoagulant/antithrombic agents and corticosteroids, were the most frequently reported agents. The frequent reporting of immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents among cases of COVID-19 suggests increased vulnerability to infection among treated patients, either because of immunosuppressive effects of certain agents or the nature of the underlying treated condition. In cases involving off-label pharmacotherapy use for the treatment of COVID-19-related conditions, the most frequently reported therapeutic classes included antibiotics, antimalarial agents, antivirals/antiretroviral agents, immunosuppressant/immunomodulating agents, corticosteroids, anticoagulants, and immunoglobulin/interferons. The most frequently reported pharmacotherapeutic agents were azithromycin and chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine, followed by lopinavir-ritonavir, ceftriaxone, and tofacitinib. The most frequently reported clinical adverse events associated with azithromycin (as sole therapy or combined with chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine) include electrocardiogram QT prolonged, drug interaction, hepatitis, diarrhea, and hepatitis acute. Regarding cardiac-related events, 19% (120/645) of azithromycin cases reported events associated with QT prolongation/torsade de pointes (which included seven fatal cardiac events). The most frequently reported clinical adverse events associated with other commonly used agents are also presented. CONCLUSIONS: This pharmacovigilance surveillance study provides a unique characterization of cases in which a broad range of pharmaceutical products was reported in relation to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , COVID-19/epidemiology , Drug Industry/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Global Health/trends , Pharmacovigilance , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/standards , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Databases, Factual/standards , Databases, Factual/trends , Drug Industry/standards , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Global Health/standards , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
6.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 43(10): 1570-1576, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32999167

ABSTRACT

Yokukansan is a Kampo formula that is commonly used by the elderly because it is expected to improve peripheral symptoms of dementia and delirium. However, side effects from its use are frequently reported in the elderly. In particular, pseudoaldosteronism caused by the licorice contained in yokukansan leads to hypertension, hypokalemia, and muscle weakness, which may result in death. This study aimed to identify the risk factors of pseudoaldosteronism with yokukansan use. Using cases reported in the Japanese Adverse Drug Report (JADER) database, the reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated and compared to assess the risk of pseudoaldosteronism for each licorice-containing Kampo formula. We also analyzed the risk factors for pseudoaldosteronism in patients taking yokukansan. Yokukansan (ROR 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9-2.8; p < 0.001) had a higher risk of pseudoaldosteronism than that of other licorice-containing Kampo formulas. Furthermore, the results of a logistic regression analysis in patients taking yokukansan showed that the licorice dose (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0; p < 0.01), older age (<70 years, OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.8-20; p < 0.01), dementia (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6-4.9; p < 0.001), low body weight (<50 kg, OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-3.5; p = 0.034) were risk factors for pseudoaldosteronism, Although not significant, treatment with loop diuretics (OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.98-3.5; p = 0.059) tended to increase the risk of pseudoaldosteronism. In summary, patients must understand the risk factors when considering taking yokukansan and reduce the licorice dose they consume.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Data Analysis , Databases, Factual/trends , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/adverse effects , Liddle Syndrome/chemically induced , Liddle Syndrome/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Liddle Syndrome/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Young Adult
8.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 8(5): e00657, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32930524

ABSTRACT

We aimed to determine the reporting trends and characteristics of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from the Zimbabwean national pharmacovigilance system. ICSRs submitted to VigiBaseTM , the World Health Organisation's ICSR database between January 1993 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed with respect to the suspected medicine, System Organ Class (SOC), adverse drug reaction (ADR) type and seriousness, Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) group, age, and gender. In total, 4071 ICSRs were submitted to VigiBaseTM from targeted spontaneous reporting (n = 2909; 71.5%), vaccine surveillance (n = 679; 16.7%), and passive spontaneous reporting (n = 483; 11.9%), respectively. The median age, ICSR completeness score and timeliness of reporting were 34.0 years (IQR: 14.0; 43.0), 0.90 (IQR: 0.70; 1.00), and 548.0 days (IQR: 266:1131), respectively. More than half of the ICRS were from female patients (n = 2233; 54.9%). Antiretrovirals, antibiotics, vaccines, and anti-tubercular medicines were reported in 62.9%, 27.9%, 16.7%, and 13.3% of submitted ICSRs, respectively. The most frequent ADRs involved the skin and subcutaneous systems (n = 1111; 20.5%), nervous system (n = 733; 13.5%), and gastrointestinal disorders system (n = 654; 12.1%). The number of ADRs reported for each patient was significantly related to the reported medicine's ATC category (P = .001. The number of ADRs was significantly related to the use of antiretroviral agents. In conclusion, Zimbabwe has made significant progress in establishing a functional pharmacovigilance system. However, the present system reports on a limited therapeutic spectrum of medicines and potentially underestimates the national ADR burden. Further work is required to strengthen the more sustainable spontaneous reporting system which potentially captures a variety of therapeutic classes.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/classification , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Retroviral Agents/adverse effects , Antitubercular Agents/adverse effects , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmacovigilance , Retrospective Studies , Vaccines/adverse effects , Young Adult , Zimbabwe/epidemiology
9.
Psychiatry Res ; 291: 113249, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32603929

ABSTRACT

This study aims to assess the differences in adverse event profiles of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) and oral antipsychotics (OAPs) using real-world data in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Reporting odds ratios were determined using disproportionality analysis to estimate the risk of adverse events for LAIs and OAPs. Differences in adverse event profiles between formulations were determined after propensity score matching. Time-to-onset of adverse events was compared between LAIs and OAPs using the Weibull shape parameter. Signals were detected for approximately 50% of the adverse events (12 of 22) with LAIs and for the majority of adverse events (19 of 22) with OAPs. LAIs was associated with significantly lower reporting rate than OAPs for extrapyramidal symptom, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and dystonia. For QT prolongation, convulsions, and hyperglycemia associated with LAIs, the 95% Confidence Interval of ß included 1 in time-to-onset analysis. Real-world data suggest that LAIs tend to reduce the occurrence of extrapyramidal symptom and neuroleptic malignant syndrome, but a number of other adverse events have potential risks as well as OAPs. In addition, onset of adverse events with LAIs have been shown to be slightly delayed, requiring more careful long-term monitoring.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Databases, Factual , Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage , Delayed-Action Preparations/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections , Japan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32536336

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: SAEFVIC is the Victorian surveillance system for adverse events following immunisation (AEFI). It enhances passive surveillance by also providing clinical support and education to vaccinees and immunisation providers. This report summarises surveillance, clinical and vaccine pharmacovigilance activities of SAEFVIC in 2018. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study of AEFI reports received by SAEFVIC in 2018, compared with previous years since 2008. Data were categorised by vaccinee demographics of age, sex, pregnancy and Indigenous status, vaccines administered and AEFI reactions reported. Age cohorts were defined as infant (0-12 months); young child (1-4 years); school-aged (5-17 years); adult (18-64 years); and older person (65+ years). Proportional reporting ratios were calculated for signal investigation of serious adverse neurological events with all vaccines and with influenza vaccines. Clinical support services and educational activities are described. RESULTS: SAEFVIC received 1730 AEFI reports (26.8 per 100,000 population), with 9.3% considered serious. Nineteen percent (n = 329) attended clinical review. Annual AEFI reporting trends increased for infants, children and older persons, but were stable for school-aged and adult cohorts. Females comprised 55% of all reports and over 80% of reports among adults. There were 17 reports of AEFI in pregnant women and 12 (0.7%) in persons identifying as Indigenous Australians. A possible signal regarding serious adverse neurological events (SANE) was detected, but was not supported by signal validation testing. A clinical investigation is ongoing. Two deaths were reported coincident to immunisation with no evidence of causal association. CONCLUSION: SAEFVIC continues to provide robust AEFI surveillance supporting vaccine safety monitoring in Victoria and Australia, with new signal detection and validation methodologies strengthening capabilities.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Immunization/adverse effects , Immunization/statistics & numerical data , Pharmacovigilance , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Retrospective Studies , Victoria/epidemiology , Young Adult
11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32536339

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The Paediatric Active Enhanced Disease Surveillance (PAEDS) network is a hospital-based active surveillance system employing prospective case ascertainment for selected serious childhood conditions, particularly vaccine-preventable diseases and potential adverse events following immunisation (AEFI). This report presents surveillance data for 2017 and 2018. Methods: Specialist nurses screened hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) records, laboratory and other data on a daily basis in seven paediatric tertiary referral hospitals across Australia to identify children with the conditions under surveillance. In 2017 and 2018 these included acute flaccid paralysis (AFP; a syndrome associated with poliovirus infection), acute childhood encephalitis (ACE), influenza, intussusception (IS; a potential AEFI with rotavirus vaccines), pertussis, varicella-zoster virus infection (varicella and herpes zoster), invasive meningococcal, and invasive Group A streptococcus diseases. An additional social research component was added to evaluate parental attitudes to vaccination. Results: PAEDS captured 1,580 and 925 cases for 2017 and 2018, respectively, across all conditions under surveillance. Key outcomes of PAEDS included: contribution to national AFP surveillance to reach the World Health Organization reporting targets; identification of a third human parechovirus outbreak among other infectious diseases linked to ACE; demonstration of variable influenza activity between 2017 and 2018, with vaccine effectiveness (VE) analysis demonstrating that the protection offered through vaccination is season-dependent. All IS cases associated with vaccine receipt were reported to the relevant state health department. Varicella and herpes zoster case numbers remained unchanged, with vaccine uptake found to be suboptimal among eligible children under the NIP. Enhanced pertussis surveillance continues to capture controls for VE estimation. Surveillance for invasive meningococcal disease showed predominance for serotype B at 57% over 2 years among 77 cases where serotyping was available, and surveillance for invasive group A streptococcus captured severe disease in children. Conclusion: PAEDS continues to provide unique policy-relevant data on serious paediatric conditions using hospital-based sentinel surveillance.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/trends , Population Surveillance , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Australia/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Prospective Studies
12.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 39(5): 369-373, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32176185

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: California Senate Bill 277 (SB277) eliminated non-medical immunization exemptions. Since its introduction on February 19, 2015, the rate of medical exemptions in the state has increased. Filing a report to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) may be perceived as helpful in applying for a medical exemption. Our objective was to describe trends in reporting to VAERS from California coincident with introduction of SB277. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of Californian children <18 years for whom a VAERS report was submitted between June 1, 2011 and July 31, 2018. VAERS is a national, passive, vaccine safety surveillance program co-managed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and FDA. The main outcomes were the proportion of VAERS reports submitted by parents (vs. other reporter types), time from immunization to VAERS report (reporting time), and adverse event type. We also performed spatial analysis, mapping reports pre- and post-mandate by county. RESULTS: We identified 6703 VAERS reports from California during the study period. The proportion of reports received from parents increased after implementation of SB277, from 14% to 23%. The median reporting time by parents increased from 9 days in 2013-2014 to 31 days in 2016-2017. After the introduction of SB277, we observed an increase in reports describing behavioral and developmental symptoms among reports submitted >6 months after immunization. CONCLUSIONS: These recent changes in reporting patterns coincident with the introduction of SB277 may indicate that more parents are using VAERS to assist in applying for a medical exemption for their child.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Policy , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudence , Vaccines/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , California , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Parents , Retrospective Studies
13.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 16(3): 227-238, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32054370

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the cornerstone of treatment of patients with epilepsy, and there are presently 27 licensed AEDs making AEDs among the most common medications for which therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is performed. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current evidence of the use and implementation of AED TDM in patients with epilepsy and other non-epilepsy conditions.Areas covered: The pharmacokinetic variability of AEDs is extensive, resulting in pronounced variability in serum concentrations between patients. TDM may thus be useful to individualize the treatment of patients with epilepsy and also in non-epilepsy conditions. Indications for TDM include settings where pharmacokinetic variability is anticipated (e.g. in children, the elderly, during pregnancy, and patients prescribed polytherapy resulting in drug interactions) and drug adherence. TDM contributes to provide a quality assurance of the treatment. Patient management is, therefore, best guided by the determination of individual therapeutic concentrations.Expert opinion: Because of pharmacokinetic variability is prevalent among AEDs, TDM allows a bespoke approach to epilepsy care allowing dose adjustments based on measured drug concentrations so as to optimize clinical outcome. Future advances include the use of additional markers of toxicity and genetic variability so as to further aid individualization and optimize AED treatment.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants/pharmacokinetics , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Drug Monitoring/methods , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/metabolism , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Animals , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Interactions/physiology , Epilepsy/genetics , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Pharmacogenetics/methods , Pharmacogenetics/trends , Pregnancy
14.
Diabetes Care ; 43(1): 244-246, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31597667

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised metformin's label to permit use in patients with mild-moderate chronic kidney disease. We sought to determine whether this change was associated with increased reports of metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA) to the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Publicly available FAERS reports were analyzed. RESULTS: MALA reports increased from 521 in 2015 to 1,939 in 2018. After restriction to U.S. reports, absolute and relative increase in MALA reports was less, from 111 to 243. The proportionate reporting ratio (PRR), a measure adjusted for rates of other adverse event reports, was stable. CONCLUSIONS: The increased reports deserve attention, but the PRR's stability and FAERS's known limitations, including lack of a denominator or control group, do not permit the conclusion that U.S. MALA rates have increased. Further study with more robust data sources is needed.


Subject(s)
Acidosis, Lactic/chemically induced , Acidosis, Lactic/epidemiology , Metformin/adverse effects , Adult , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/history , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Aged , Diabetic Nephropathies/drug therapy , Diabetic Nephropathies/epidemiology , Female , History, 21st Century , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/drug therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration , Young Adult
15.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(2): 173-181, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31823506

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The spontaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting system plays an important role in pharmacovigilance by providing information from clinical settings in the postmarketing environment. The Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database contains a portion of Japanese ADR reports, and no previous study has described the quality or characteristics of ADR reports in the JADER. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of the JADER database and to evaluate the quality of ADR reports contained in the JADER using the documentation-grading scheme developed by the World Health Organization. METHODS: Of 478 508 ADR reports in the JADER, the analysis set consisted of 395 091 reports meeting inclusion criteria. An analysis was carried out to evaluate the quality of the reports according to the type of report, the type of sender, and the qualification of the reporter. Annual changes in the number of reports from medical institutions submitted by pharmacists were compared with changes in the number submitted by physicians. RESULTS: The distribution of documentation grade differed according to the type of report, the type of sender, and the qualification of the reporter. Regarding "medical institution reports", the quality of reports was similar among qualification types, while the quality of reports submitted by physicians was higher for "company reports" and "study reports" (P < .0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the quality of the ADR reports in the JADER differed among the type of report, the sender of the report, and the qualification of the reporter.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/standards , Databases, Factual/standards , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Pharmacists/standards , Physicians/standards , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Databases, Factual/trends , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Pharmacists/trends , Physicians/trends
16.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 206: 107709, 2020 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31732295

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although there have been increasing reports of intentional gabapentin misuse, epidemiological evidence for the phenomenon is limited. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are pharmacovigilance abuse signals for gabapentin. METHODS: Using FDA Adverse Events Reporting System reports from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015, we calculated pharmacovigilance signal measures (i.e., reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, information component, and empirical Bayes geometric mean) for abuse-related adverse event (AR-AE)-gabapentin pairs. Loglinear modeling assessed the frequency of concurrent reporting of abuse-related and abuse-specific AEs (AS-AEs) associated with gabapentin. Findings were compared to a positive (pregabalin) and negative (duloxetine) control. RESULTS: From 2005-2015 there were 5,951,229 unique AE reports submitted to the FDA including 99,977 for gabapentin, 73,977 for duloxetine, and 97,813 for pregabalin. Significant drug-AR-AE pair signals involving gabapentin included: drug abuser, multiple drug overdose, and substance-induced psychotic disorder. Significant drug AR-AE signals involving gabapentin and pregabalin, but not duloxetine, were: ataxia, dependence, drug abuse, increased drug tolerance, and overdose. Compared to duloxetine, gabapentin had significantly greater odds of a co-report for an AS-AE with drug withdrawal syndrome (OR: 6.55), auditory hallucinations (OR: 4.57), delusions (OR: 2.36), euphoric mood (OR: 5.45), ataxia (OR: 2.85), drug abuser (OR: 3.01), aggression (OR: 1.98), psychotic disorder (OR: 1.96), and feeling abnormal (OR: 1.31). CONCLUSIONS: We identified abuse-related signals for gabapentin and highlighted several CNS effects that may be associated with its abuse. Gabapentin prescribers should be aware of the drug's abuse liability and effects that may accompany its use.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/statistics & numerical data , Gabapentin/adverse effects , Pharmacovigilance , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , United States Food and Drug Administration/statistics & numerical data , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Bayes Theorem , Databases, Factual , Duloxetine Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Humans , Pregabalin/adverse effects , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology
17.
Rev. Pesqui. (Univ. Fed. Estado Rio J., Online) ; 12: 468-475, jan.-dez. 2020. ilus, tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1087433

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: a avaliação da cultura de segurança do paciente permite aos hospitais identificar e gerir prospectivamente questões relevantes de segurança em suas rotinas de trabalho. Método: estudo quantitativo, transversal e descritivo, ocorrida no ano de 2017 na Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Adulta em um hospital privado, localizado em Niterói/RJ. A população foram os profissionais médicos e equipe de enfermagem, utilizando análise estatística por meio de programa R, com a interface Rcmdr. Resultados: baseados nas respostas às perguntas sobre notificação de eventos aplicada com a Pesquisa de Cultura de Segurança do Paciente a 97 profissionais, com uma taxa de resposta de 85,6%, correspondendo a 83 profissionais. Menos de 45% dos participantes da pesquisa sempre notificam um erro, engano ou falha, que afete ou não o paciente, 59,0% não fizeram nenhuma notificação nos últimos 12 meses antecedentes à pesquisa e não houve diferença significativa na quantidade de notificação que destacasse uma categoria profissional, graduados ou não. Discussão: houve maior adesão à notificação de eventos pelos com maior tempo de hospital e com maior tempo naquela terapia intensiva. Não se encontrou correlação do número de notificações relatadas com o tempo de profissão e com a carga horária de trabalho. Conclusão: no que tange à conscientização de incrementar a adesão à notificação de eventos, a análise realizada contribuiu para a melhoria da segurança do paciente


Objective: ealuating the patient's safety culture allows hospitals to identify and manage relevant safety issues prospectively in their work routines. Method: a quantitative, transversal and descriptive study, carried out in 2017 at the Adult Intensive Care Unit in a private hospital, located in Niterói / RJ. The population were medical professionals and nursing staff, using statistical analysis through program R, with the Rcmdr interface. Results: based on responses to questions about event notification applied with the Patient Safety Culture Survey to 97 professionals, with a response rate of 85.6%, corresponding to 83 professionals. Less than 45% of respondents report an error, deception, or failure, affecting the patient, 59.0% did not report in the last 12 months prior to the survey, and there was no significant difference in the amount of notification that stood out a professional category, graduates or not. Discussion: there was greater adherence to the notification of events by those with longer hospital time and with more time in that intensive therapy. There was no correlation between the number of reports reported with the time of profession and the workload. Conclusion: with regard to the awareness of increasing adherence to event notification, the analysis performed contributed to the improvement of patient safety


Objetivo: la evaluación de la cultura de seguridad del paciente permite a los hospitales identificar y gestionar prospectivamente cuestiones relevantes de seguridad en sus rutinas de trabajo. Método: estudio cuantitativo, transversal y descriptivo, ocurrido en el año 2017 en la Unidad de Terapia Intensiva Adulta en un hospital privado, ubicado en Niterói / RJ. La población fueron los profesionales médicos y equipo de enfermería, utilizando análisis estadístico por medio del programa R, con la interfaz Rcmdr. Resultados: basados en las respuestas a las preguntas sobre notificación de eventos aplicada con la Encuesta de Cultura de Seguridad del Paciente a 97 profesionales, con una tasa de respuesta del 85,6%, correspondiendo a 83 profesionales. En la mayoría de los casos, la mayoría de las personas que sufren de la enfermedad de Alzheimer, una categoría profesional, graduados o no. Discusión: hubo mayor adhesión a la notificación de eventos por los con mayor tiempo de hospital y con mayor tiempo en aquella terapia intensiva. No se encontró correlación del número de notificaciones relatadas con el tiempo de profesión y con la carga horaria de trabajo. Conclusión: en lo que concierne a la concientización de incrementar la adhesión a la notificación de eventos, el análisis realizado contribuyó a la mejora de la seguridad del paciente


Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Monitoring/instrumentation , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Risk Assessment , Intensive Care Units
18.
Pediatrics ; 144(6)2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740498

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Human papillomavirus is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States and causes certain anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers. The 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (9vHPV) provides protection against additional types not included in the quadrivalent vaccine. We conducted near real-time vaccine safety surveillance for 24 months after the vaccine became available in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. METHODS: Immunizations and adverse events were extracted weekly from October 2015 to October 2017 from standardized data files for persons 9 to 26 years old at 6 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites. Prespecified adverse events included anaphylaxis, allergic reaction, appendicitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, injection site reaction, pancreatitis, seizure, stroke, syncope, and venous thromboembolism. The observed and expected numbers of events after 9vHPV were compared weekly by using sequential methods. Both historical and concurrent comparison groups were used to identify statistical signals for adverse events. Unexpected signals were investigated by medical record review and/or additional analyses. RESULTS: During 105 weeks of surveillance, 838 991 doses of 9vHPV were administered. We identified unexpected statistical signals for 4 adverse events: appendicitis among boys 9 to 17 years old after dose 3; pancreatitis among men 18 to 26 years old; and allergic reactions among girls 9 to 17 years old and women 18 to 26 years old after dose 2. On further evaluation, which included medical record review, temporal scan analysis, and additional epidemiological analyses, we did not confirm signals for any adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: After 2 years of near real-time surveillance of 9vHPV and several prespecified adverse events, no new safety concerns were identified.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Epidemiological Monitoring , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Appendicitis/chemically induced , Appendicitis/epidemiology , Child , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Pancreatitis/chemically induced , Pancreatitis/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
19.
Pediatrics ; 144(6)2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740500

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (9vHPV) was approved for females and males aged 9 to 26 years in 2014. We analyzed postlicensure surveillance reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). METHODS: We searched VAERS data for US reports of adverse events (AEs) after 9vHPV from December 2014 through December 2017. We calculated reporting rates and conducted empirical Bayesian data mining to identify disproportional reporting. Physicians reviewed reports for selected prespecified conditions. RESULTS: VAERS received 7244 reports after 9vHPV: 31.2% among females, 21.6% among males, and for 47.2%, sex was not reported. Overall, 97.4% of reports were nonserious. Dizziness, syncope, headache, and injection site reactions were most commonly reported; the most commonly reported AEs were similar between females and males. Two reports of death after 9vHPV were verified; no information in autopsy reports or death certificates suggested a causal relationship with vaccination. Approximately 28 million 9vHPV doses were distributed during the study period; crude AE reporting rates were 259 reports per million 9vHPV doses distributed for all reports and 7 per million doses distributed for serious reports. Syncope (a known AE associated with human papillomavirus vaccination) and several types of vaccine administration errors (eg, administered at wrong age) exceeded the statistical threshold for empirical Bayesian data mining findings. CONCLUSIONS: No new or unexpected safety concerns or reporting patterns of 9vHPV with clinically important AEs were detected. The safety profile of 9vHPV is consistent with data from prelicensure trials and from postmarketing safety data of its predecessor, the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Databases, Factual/trends , Dizziness/chemically induced , Dizziness/epidemiology , Female , Headache/chemically induced , Headache/epidemiology , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
20.
Therapie ; 74(6): 557-567, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31623850

ABSTRACT

The discovery and quantification of adverse drug reactions has long relied on the careful analysis of spontaneously reported cases. Causality assessment (imputation) was a fundamental feature of individual case report analysis. This was complemented by analysis of aggregated cases, and of disproportionality analyses in spontaneous reports databases. In the absence of more specific information sources, these have resulted in the discovery of many new adverse reactions, altering drug information. It has led to the withdrawal from the market of many drugs, but its use for risk quantification remains fraught with uncertainty. The recent access to population-wide claims or electronic health records databases have confirmed for spontaneous reporting a predominant role in hypothesis generation for serious adverse drug reactions, notably those that result in hospital admission or death. In these cases, the events are identifiable at the population level, and can be quantified precisely using the tools of modern pharmacoepidemiology, to generate specific benefit-risk analyses. Spontaneous reporting remains irreplaceable in signal and alert generation in drug safety, despite its inherent limitations. For signal strengthening and assessment, more systematic and quantitative methods should be sought, such as claims databases for reactions resulting in hospital admissions.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Pharmacovigilance , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/organization & administration , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/standards , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems/trends , Data Collection/methods , Data Collection/standards , Databases, Factual , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Electronic Health Records/organization & administration , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Patient Safety , Pharmacoepidemiology/methods , Pharmacoepidemiology/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...